K2 Underground » Feedback and Community Contrib... » How to’s and Best Practices (f... » Re: Virtual PC vs Virtual Server
Virtual PC vs Virtual Server

Last post 09-16-2007, 3:24 AM by johnny. 2 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next

  •  09-13-2007, 12:56 PM 18614

    Virtual PC vs Virtual Server

    Does anyone have any experience with performance of Virtual PC vs Virtual Server - specifcally running K2 would be best, but at this point any performance comparison of the 2 would be helpful. 

    Thanks

    -Matt

    The statements and opinions made in my postings are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of SourceCode Technology Holdings, Inc. or its subsidiaries. All information is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, and grants no rights or licenses.
    Filed under:

  •  09-13-2007, 1:10 PM 18617 in reply to 18614

    • ccalcut is not online. Last active: 10-06-2008, 1:23 PM ccalcut
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on 08-21-2007
    • Bellevue, Washington, USA
    • Posts 62
    • Points 196

    Re: Virtual PC vs Virtual Server

    Matt -

    I would suggest using Virtual Server. It has better performance from what I have seen. Less resources are used to run it unlike Virtual PC.

     Cory C

    - Cory C

  •  09-16-2007, 3:24 AM 18670 in reply to 18614

    Re: Virtual PC vs Virtual Server

    From what I know, Virtual PC is optimized to run a single active instance (CPU is proritized for the active instance).  Virtual Server is optimized to run multiple running instances.
View as RSS news feed in XML